Printable Version
PDF
Purple Nutsedge Control with Imazaquin
in Bermudagrass Turf
Bul
408
B. J. Johnson and T. R. Murphy
Purple nutsedge
[Cyperus rotundus
(L.)] is one of the most difficult weeds to control in bermudagrass
(Cynodon spp.) after
the turf has been established (Coats et al. 1987). This weed is also a severe
problem in many other grasses and crops in more than 90 countries of the world
(Bendixen and Nandihalli
1987; Holm et al. 1977). In the
Researchers and turfgrass managers have attempted to control purple nutsedge in turfgrasses for nearly three decades. Repeated postemergence applications of arsonate herbicides have given initial control (Hamilton 1971; Long et al. 1962; Sturkie 1967), but regrowth usually occurs. Foliage of purple nutsedge plants were killed by 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], but new underground tubers began to sprout within three to four weeks (Loustalot et al. 1954). Bentazon {3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] and perfluidone {[1,1,1-trifluoro-N-[2-methyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)phenyl]-methanesulfonamide} did not effectively control purple nutsedge in an earlier study in Georgia (Johnson 1975).
Bentazon is used by turfgrass managers for control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) but not for purple nutsedge. Imazaquin {2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5 -oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quino-linecarboxylic acid}. The herbicide has shown postemergence activity on purple nutsedge (Coats et al. 1987; Menn and Beard 1989).
Because purple nutsedge is difficult to control when growing with bermudagrass, experiments were initiated with imazaquin applied alone or with MSMA (monosodium salt of MAA) to determine the frequency of treatments needed to obtain effective control.
Materials and Methods
Three experiments were
conducted on purple nutsedge control in an
established mixed `Tifway' (C. dactylon x C. transvaalensis
Burtt-Davy) and common bermudagrass
[C. dactylon (L.) Pers.] turf
with imazaquin applied alone or with MSMA from 1986
through 1988 at the Augusta National Golf Club,
Table 1. Purple Nutsedge
Experiments Conducted on Bermudagrass
|
Experiment |
Type |
Location |
Date Applied |
Date Rated |
|
I |
Annual imazaquin treatments |
Augusta National Golf Club |
1986: July 18 1987: |
August
1,15 |
|
II |
Imazaquin formulations |
Augusta National Golf Club |
1987: July 13 1988: July 21 |
July 13,28
|
|
III |
Multiple imazaquin treatments |
Augusta National Golf Club |
1987: June
1 1988: June 10
|
June 1,15
|
|
IV |
Tolerance of common bermudagrass |
Georgia
Station, |
1989: May
31 1990: May 30 |
June
5,14,22 |
Augusta National Golf
Club
Experiment II. Imazaquin
was applied as a liquid concentrate (LC) and granular (G) formulations to
purple nutsedge on the same plots in 1987 and 1988. A
tank-mixture of imazaquin LC plus MSMA was also
included. Table 4 gives herbicide rates. Imazaquin G
was formulated on a
Experiment III. Imazaquin was applied alone and with MSMA in multiple applications in 1987 and 1988. The first application was made June 5 ± five days, and the second application was made July 18 ± six days. Table 7 gives the rates and frequency of application. Treatments were made to different plots each year. The purple nutsedge population was uniform, with average cover of 47% when the first treatments were made.
Table 2. Influence of Imazaquin
Applied Alone or with MSMA as a Single Annual Application for Three Consecutive
Years on Purple Nutsedge Control in Experiment I at
Augusta National Golf Club,
|
Treatmentsa |
Purple nutsedge controlb |
|||||||||
| 1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
||||||||
| Herbicide |
Rate lb ai/A |
AUG 1 |
AUG 15 |
OCT 2 |
JULY 28 |
AUG 12 |
AUG 31 |
AUG 4 |
AUG 15 |
AUG 30 |
| Untreated |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.5 |
92 |
100 |
69 |
88 |
92 |
87 |
98 |
95 |
85 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.5 + 2.0 |
100 |
97 |
73 |
100 |
98 |
91 |
100 |
99 |
97 |
| Imazaquin |
0.38 |
82 |
88 |
47 |
80 |
77 |
70 |
95 |
91 |
77 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
100 |
99 |
87 |
100 |
98 |
94 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Imazaquin |
0.25 |
82 |
62 |
50 |
77 |
70 |
60 |
93 |
77 |
57 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
100 |
90 |
80 |
100 |
94 |
90 |
100 |
100 |
96 |
| MSMA |
2.0 |
35 |
42 |
35 |
37 |
38 |
30 |
48 |
30 |
33 |
| LSD (0.05) |
12 |
18 |
25 |
12 |
14 |
22 |
4 |
13 |
18 |
|
a. Herbicides were applied
to the same plots
b. Purple nutsedge
control ratings were based on 0 = no control and 100 = complete control.
Table 3. Influence of Imazaquin
Applied Alone or with MSMA as a Single Annual Application for Three Consecutive
Years on Population of Purple Nutsedge in Experiment
I at Augusta National Golf Club,
|
Treatmentsa |
Purple nutsedge cover |
|||||
| 1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
||||
| Herbicide |
Rate |
Oct. 2 |
July 28 |
Aug 31 |
July 21 |
Aug 30 |
| Untreated |
- |
62 |
25 |
62 |
45 |
67 |
| Imazaquin |
0.5 |
16 |
17 |
9 |
19 |
11 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.5 + 2.0 |
14 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
| Imazaquin |
0.38 |
28 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
17 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.25 |
28 |
28 |
30 |
18 |
28 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
12 |
0 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
| MSMA |
2.0 |
30 |
28 |
42 |
33 |
42 |
| LSD (0.05) |
15 |
25 |
22 |
17 |
15 |
|
a. Herbicides were applied
to the same plots on
Table 4. Influence of Imazaquin
Applied Alone or with MSMA as a Single Annual Application for Two Consecutive
Years on Purple Nutsedge Control in Bermudagrass in Experiment II at Augusta National Golf
Club, Augusta GA
|
Treatmentsa |
Purple nutsedge controlb |
|||||||
| 1987 |
1988 |
|||||||
| Herbicidec |
Rate lb/ai/A |
July 28 |
Aug 12 |
Aug 31 |
July 21 |
Aug 4 |
Aug 15 |
Aug 30 |
| Untreated |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Imazaquin LC |
0.5 |
80 |
73 |
48 |
26 |
93 |
78 |
63 |
| Imazaquin LC + MSMA |
0.5 + 2.0 |
98 |
75 |
65 |
53 |
99 |
93 |
86 |
| Imazaquin LC |
0.38 |
73 |
73 |
45 |
26 |
88 |
67 |
50 |
| Imazaquin LC + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
95 |
78 |
62 |
52 |
100 |
94 |
86 |
| Imazaquin G |
0.38 |
80 |
68 |
53 |
50 |
88 |
81 |
69 |
| Imazaquin LC |
0.25 |
73 |
70 |
43 |
3 |
85 |
53 |
38 |
| Imazaquin LC + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
90 |
70 |
65 |
42 |
98 |
83 |
83 |
| Imazaquin G |
0.25 |
54 |
50 |
45 |
8 |
65 |
57 |
25 |
| MSMA |
2.0 |
43 |
33 |
50 |
13 |
49 |
13 |
27 |
| LSD (0.05) |
18 |
19 |
16 |
NS |
8 |
20 |
16 |
|
a. Herbicides were applied
to the same plots
b. Purple nutsedge
control ratings were based on 0 = no control and 100 = complete control.
c. LC = liquid concentrate, G =
granular.
Georgia Station
Experiment IV. A weed-free, common bermudagrass turf was treated with imazaquin
at 0.38 and 0.5 lb ai/acre in 1988 and 1990. The
treatments were initially applied May 31 and repeated June 22 ± one day to the
same plots both years. The normal time period between imazaquin
applications for purple nutsedge control is at least
a six-week interval. However, the repeated applications were made at three-week
intervals in the present study to determine maximum turfgrass
injury from imazaquin.
General information
Bermudagrass in all experiments was an established turf that was cut at a height of 1.0-1.25 inches once or twice per week. Purple nutsedge generally had four to six leaves at time of treatment. A normal fertility program for bermudagrass (annual 4 to 6 lb N/1000 ft2) was followed in all experiments. This included a balanced fertilizer (N-P-K) in early April and early September, with additional N applied as needed during late spring and summer. Irrigation was applied as needed to maintain a good quality turf.
Herbicides were applied in
25 and 40 gal water/acre at
Table 5. Influence of Imazaquin
Applied Alone or with MSMA as a Single Annual Application for Two Consecutive
Years on Population of Purple Nutsedge in Experiment
II at Augusta National Golf Club,
|
Treatmentsa |
Purple nutsedge cover |
||||
| 1987 |
1988 |
||||
| Herbicideb |
Rate |
July 13 |
Aug 31 |
July 21 |
Aug. 30 |
| Untreated |
- |
37 |
48 |
38 |
67 |
| Imazaquin LC |
0.5 |
50 |
32 |
28 |
27 |
| Imazaquin LC + MSMA |
0.5 + 2.0 |
53 |
20 |
18 |
10 |
| Imazaquin LC |
0.38 |
55 |
30 |
28 |
35 |
| Imazaquin LC + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
52 |
23 |
17 |
10 |
| Imazaquin G |
0.38 |
42 |
28 |
19 |
23 |
| Imazaquin LC |
0.25 |
50 |
37 |
37 |
42 |
| Imazaquin LC + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
43 |
22 |
22 |
15 |
| Imazaquin G |
0.25 |
52 |
38 |
35 |
48 |
| MSMA |
2.0 |
45 |
33 |
33 |
50 |
| LSD (0.05) |
NS |
13 |
NS |
11 |
|
a. Herbicides were applied
to the same plots on
b. LC = liquid concentrate, G =
granular.
Visual estimates of bermudagrass injury, purple nutsedge
control, and cover ratings were made at 2- to 3-week intervals as needed to
show the maximum response to herbicides. At
The experimental design was
a randomized complete block with three replications. Plot size varied but was >
5 by 10 ft in all experiments. Analysis of variance using the Statistical
Analysis System (General Linear Model Procedure) (SAS Institute 1982) was
conducted. Due to year interactions, mean data are reported for each year.
Means are separated by LSD at the 0.05 level.
Table 6. Influence of Sequential Imazaquin Treatments Applied Alone or with MSMA for Purple Nutsedge Control in Bermudagrass
in Experiment III in 1987 at Augusta National Golf Club,
| Treatmentsa |
Purple nutsedge controlb |
Bermudagrass injuryc |
||||||
| Herbicide |
Rate lb ai/A |
Application No. |
Jun 15 |
July 13 |
July 28 |
Aug 31 |
Jun 15 |
July 28 |
| Untreated |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.25 |
1 |
75 |
55 |
10 |
27 |
5 |
0 |
| 2 |
73 |
58 |
82 |
72 |
5 |
0 |
||
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
1 |
100 |
78 |
72 |
73 |
8 |
0 |
| 2 |
100 |
72 |
95 |
91 |
10 |
0 |
||
| Imazaquin |
0.38 |
1 |
85 |
79 |
42 |
50 |
8 |
0 |
| 2 |
83 |
81 |
95 |
86 |
8 |
5 |
||
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
1 |
100 |
87 |
72 |
80 |
11 |
0 |
| 2 |
100 |
90 |
98 |
97 |
10 |
4 |
||
| MSMA |
2.0 |
1 |
41 |
12 |
20 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
| 2 |
45 |
13 |
58 |
65 |
0 |
0 |
||
| LSD (0.05) |
8 |
14 |
22 |
22 |
3 |
NS |
||
a. Herbicides were applied
b. Purple nutsedge
control ratings were based on 0 = no control and 100 = complete control. Nutsedge population averaged 30% ground cover at the time
first herbicide application was made and population in untreated plots
increased to 47% when final ratings were made.
c. Bermudagrass
injury ratings were based on 0 = no injury, 1-20 = slight injury, 21-30 =
moderate injury, > 30 = severe injury and unacceptable, and 100 = complete
kill.
Table 7. Influence of Sequential Imazaquin Treatments Applied Alone or with MSMA for Purple Nutsedge Control in Bermudagrass
in Experiment III in 1988 at Augusta National Golf Club,
| Treatmentsa |
Purple nutsedge controlb |
Bermudagrass injuryc |
||||||
| Herbicide |
Rate |
Application no. |
Jun 24 |
July 21 |
Aug 4 |
Aug 30 |
Jun 24 |
Aug 8 |
| Untreated |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.25 |
1 |
86 |
47 |
10 |
18 |
3 |
0 |
| 2 |
93 |
72 |
99 |
87 |
5 |
10 |
||
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
1 |
100 |
88 |
63 |
68 |
4 |
2 |
| 2 |
100 |
94 |
100 |
98 |
2 |
3 |
||
| Imazaquin |
0.38 |
1 |
100 |
84 |
55 |
48 |
4 |
0 |
| 2 |
100 |
87 |
100 |
99 |
7 |
12 |
||
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
1 |
100 |
97 |
87 |
69 |
3 |
0 |
| 2 |
100 |
99 |
100 |
100 |
7 |
7 |
||
| MSMA |
2.0 |
1 |
23 |
33 |
20 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
| 2 |
34 |
40 |
77 |
53 |
0 |
0 |
||
| LSD (0.05) |
16 |
19 |
22 |
24 |
5 |
5 |
||
a. Herbicides were applied
b. Purple nutsedge
control ratings were based on 0 = no control and 100 = complete control. Nutsedge population averaged 17% ground cover at the time
first herbicide application was made and population in untreated plots
increased to 47% when final ratings were made.
c. Bermudagrass
injury ratings were based on 0 = no injury, 1-20 = slight injury, 21-30 =
moderate injury, > 30 = severe injury and unacceptable, and 100 = complete
kill.
Results and Discussion
Purple nutsedge control
Experiment I--annual treatments for three years. Imazaquin applied alone or tank-mixed with MSMA controlled a higher percentage of purple nutsedge than did MSMA alone when ratings were made August 1 at two weeks after treatment (WAT) in 1986 (table 2). The control was 10% greater in plots treated with imazaquin at 0.5 lb/acre than at < 0.38 lb/acre. Purple nutsedge control was 100% at two WAT with imazaquin plus MSMA, regardless of imazaquin rate. By August 15 or four WAT, the control from each treatment was similar to that obtained on August 1, except in plots treated with imazaquin at 0.25 lb/acre. The control of purple nutsedge treated with 0.25 lb/acre decreased from 82% to 62% from two to four WAT.
Although a single application of imazaquin provided acceptable purple nutsedge control initially, control decreased to an unacceptable level (47% to 69%) by October 2 or 10 WAT (table 2). There was no difference at 10 weeks when imazaquin at 0.5 lb/acre was applied alone or with MSMA. However, control was greater from the combination of imazaquin plus MSMA when imazaquin was applied at < 0.38 lb/acre than with imazaquin applied alone at the same rate. These data, in regards to improved purple nutsedge control with imazaquin plus MSMA compared with imazaquin alone, agree with the report by Coats et al. (1987). These results show that a single herbicide application at rates used in this study will not completely control purple nutsedge after one annual treatment, whether imazaquin was applied alone or with MSMA.
When imazaquin was applied alone or with MSMA in 1987 to plots previously treated in 1986, purple nutsedge control on August 12 or four WAT was similar to the previous year (table 2). In both years, imazaquin at 0.5 lb/acre was more effective than at 0.25 lb/acre in controlling purple nutsedge at four WAT. Imazaquin plus MSMA applied in 1986 and 1987 controlled > 90% purple nutsedge, regardless of imazaquin rate when the final rating was made in 1987. MSMA applied once both years resulted in poor and unacceptable purple nutsedge control.
Imazaquin applied for three consecutive years
at 0.25 lb/acre did not effectively control purple nutsedge
(57%) when final ratings were made
Imazaquin plus MSMA is more effective in controlling purple nutsedge than imazaquin alone. The control of purple nutsedge from imazaquin plus MSMA gradually improved after each consecutive annual application. Therefore, for complete control, it will be necessary to apply these herbicides to the same turfgrass area for up to three years. This is further shown by the decrease in purple nutsedge cover that occurred during the same three-year period as a result of annual imazaquin plus MSMA applications (table 3).
Experiment II--Imazaquin formulations. When imazaquin
LC and imazaquin G were applied at 0.38 lb/acre,
there was no difference until after two annual treatments when final ratings
were made
Even though differences
occurred between imazaquin formulations, neither
effectively controlled purple nutsedge at rates
included in this study. After two annual treatments, purple nutsedge
control with imazaquin LC plus MSMA was consistently
greater than with imazaquin LC or G alone (table 4).
However, the combination of imazaquin LC plus MSMA
applied for two consecutive years did not completely control purple nutsedge. These results are also confirmed by cover ratings
in table 5. The 10% to 15% purple nutsedge cover
after annual treatment with imazaquin plus MSMA for
two years in the present study generally agrees with the results (4% to 7%
cover) obtained after two years in Experiment I (table 3). Therefore, as
reported in Experiment I, it will be necessary to apply imazaquin
plus MSMA for three consecutive years to effectively control and reduce purple nutsedge plant populations.
Experiment III--Multiple imazaquin treatments. Imazaquin applied alone in
two applications controlled a greater percentage of purple nutsedge
than did a single application when final ratings were made
The initial purple nutsedge control was similar, whether imazaquin
was applied alone or with MSMA in 1988 (table 7), but not in 1987 (table 6).
However, the control from a single application in 1988 did not last any longer
than in 1987. The control in plots from a single application of imazaquin plus MSMA at 0.25 + 2.0 lb/acre in 1988 was
reduced to 63% by August 4, compared to 73% when rated August 31, 1987. The
control in 1988 was reduced similarly when imazaquin
plus MSMA was applied once at 0.38 + 2.0 lb/acre when final ratings were made
in August. Purple nutsedge control was similar
throughout the summer for two applications of imazaquin
plus MSMA and for imazaquin applied alone.
Additionally, two applications of imazaquin at 0.25
lb/acre applied alone or with MSMA was as effective as
imazaquin at 0.38 lb/acre applied alone or with MSMA
in controlling purple nutsedge.
These results indicate that two
annual applications of imazaquin controlled a higher
percentage of purple nutsedge than did a single
application. The control from imazaquin plus MSMA was
generally better throughout the summer than with imazaquin
alone. MSMA alone did not control purple nutsedge
effectively.
Bermudagrass tolerance
Mixture of `Tifway' and common bermudagrass--Augusta
National Golf Club. When imazaquin
at 0.5 lb/acre was applied to bermudagrass in
Experiment I, a maximum injury of 23% occurred two WAT
(table 8). The injury symptom was leaf yellowing with some leaf necrosis, but
no stand loss. However, the injury was temporary, as the turf exhibited only 2%
injury by four weeks. Turf injury was slight (< 20%) when treated with any
other herbicide in 1986 or with any herbicide treatment in 1987 or 1988.
Table 8. Influence of Imazaquin
Applied Alone or with MSMA as Single Annual Applications to Bermudagrass
in Experiment I at Augusta National Golf Club,
|
Treatmentsa |
Bermudagrass injuryb |
||||||
| 1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
|||||
| HERBICIDE |
RATE |
AUG 1 |
AUG 15 |
JULY 28 |
AUG 12 |
AUG 4 |
AUG 15 |
| Untreated |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.5 |
23 |
2 |
18 |
10 |
13 |
0 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.5 + 2.0 |
13 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.38 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.38 + 2.0 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
| Imazaquin |
0.25 |
7 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
| Imazaquin + MSMA |
0.25 + 2.0 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
| MSMA |
2.0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| LSD (0.05) |
5 |
NS |
6 |
4 |
6 |
NS |
|
a. Herbicides were applied
to the same plots on
b. Bermudagrass
injury ratings were based on 0 = no injury, 1-20 = slight injury, 21-30 =
moderate injury, > 30 = severe injury and unacceptable, and 100 = complete
kill.
There was no difference in bermudagrass injury between imazaquin formulations (LC or G) in Experiment II, regardless of herbicide rate, when ratings were made four WAT in 1987 and 1988 (data not given). It is possible that injury occurred, but recovered by the time ratings were made.
Bermudagrass treated with imazaquin in Experiment II injured the turf only slightly (< 12%) when ratings were made two WAT in 1987 (table 6) and 1988 (table 7). Therefore, imazaquin was safe to apply to mixed `Tifway' and common bermudagrass.
Common
bermudagrass--Georgia Station. A single application of imazaquin at > 0.38 lb/acre injured common bermudagrass > 30% when ratings were made one WAT
in 1989 and 1990 (table 9). Turf injury was greater with imazaquin
at 0.5 lb/acre than at 0.38 lb/acre in 1989, but not in 1990. However,
regardless of rate, the turf completely recovered by three weeks after the
first application. Coats et al. (1987) reported a maximum injury of 25% to 32%
to common bermudagrass at two and three weeks after
treatment over a two-year period with imazaquin at
0.75 lb/acre. The injury was < 15% during the same period when
treated at 0.5 lb/acre. These data indicate that the maximum bermudagrass injury from imazaquin
occurred within a one-week period after treatment. Since the turf had recovered
by three weeks, the tolerance data obtained in experiments conducted at Augusta
National Golf Club recorded at two WAT or later probably was not the maximum
injury.
Table 9. Tolerance of Common Bermudagrass to Imazaquin
Treatments in Experiment IV, Griffin, GA
| Turf ratings (WAT) |
||||||||
| Applications number |
||||||||
| Ratesalb ai/A |
1 |
2 |
||||||
| 1989 |
1990 |
1989 |
1990 |
|||||
| 1 wk |
3 wK |
1 wk |
3 wk |
1 wk |
3 wk |
1 wk |
3 wk |
|
| % Turf injuryb |
||||||||
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 0.38 |
48 |
8 |
30 |
8 |
63 |
12 |
60 |
16 |
| 0.5 |
53 |
1 |
30 |
14 |
64 |
19 |
64 |
24 |
| LSD (0.05) |
3 |
NS |
3 |
NS |
4 |
11 |
7 |
10 |
| Turf densityc |
||||||||
| 0 |
8.8 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
8.6 |
8.3 |
8.8 |
8.5 |
8.4 |
| 0.38 |
8.3 |
9.3 |
8.5 |
8.7 |
8.5 |
9.1 |
7.8 |
8.9 |
| 0.5 |
8.3 |
9.0 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
| LSD (0.05) |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
a. Treatments were applied
May 31 and June 22 ± 1 day to the same plots during 1989 and 1990.
b. Turf injury ratings were
made 1 and 3 weeks after the last application and based on 0 = no injury, 1-20
= slight injury, 21-30 = moderate injury, > 30 = severe injury and unacceptable,and 100 = complete
kill.
c. Turf density ratings were
made weeks after treatment and based on 1 = no grass cover and 10 = complete
uniform cover.
When the imazaquin
application was repeated at a three-week interval to common bermudagrass,
the injury was severe (> 60%) when ratings were made one week after
the second application in 1989 and 1990 (table 9). It should be emphasized that
a repeat imazaquin application for purple nutsedge control is normally made at a six-week interval.
The severe injury from a repeat application at a three-week interval may be
higher than expected from normal applications at a six-week interval. However,
the severity of the injury from repeated applications in this experiment
indicates that imazaquin can severely injure common bermudagrass. Although common bermudagrass
treated twice with imazaquin did not completely
recover by three weeks after the second application, turf density was
unaffected (table 9). The density of common bermudagrass
was not reduced by any rate of imazaquin, regardless
of application number, throughout the two-year period. Therefore, the severe
discoloration of the turf from initial imazaquin
treatments was temporary, as the turf fully recovered with no stand loss.
Summary and Conclusions
Imazaquin was applied alone or with MSMA for purple nutsedge and bermudagrass tolerance. The major findings are as follows:
1. Imazaquin applied with MSMA generally controlled a higher percentage of purple nutsedge than when applied alone.
2. When imazaquin plus MSMA was applied as a single annual application, three years were required to obtain complete purple nutsedge control.
3. A higher percentage of purple nutsedge control was obtained when imazaquin was applied alone or with MSMA in two annual applications than was obtained from a single application.
4. There was generally no difference in purple nutsedge control, whether imazaquin was applied as a sprayable (LC) or as a granular (G) formulation.
5. Imazaquin
severely injured common bermudagrass when tolerance
ratings were made within one week of application. The injury increased from
applications repeated at a three-week interval. However, the injury was
temporary with no stand loss.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank T. Dinkins
and M. Gilmer for their technical assistance in this study.
References
Bendixen, L. E. and U. B. Nandihalli. 1987. Worldwide distribution of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:61-65.
Coats, G. E., R. F. Munoz, D. H. Anderson, D. C. Heering, and J. W. Scruggs. 1987. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control with imazaquin in warm-season turfgrasses. Weed Sci. 35:691-694.
Hamilton, K. C. 1971. Repeated foliar applications of MSMA on purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:675-677.
Holm, L.
G., D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho,
and J. P. Herberger. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press,
Johnson, B. J. 1975. Purple nutsedge control with bentazon and perfluidone in turfgrasses. Weed Sci. 23:349-353.
Long, J. A., W. W. Allen, and E. C. Holt. 1962. Control of nutsedge in bermudagrass turf. Weeds 10:285-287.
Loustalot, A. J., T. J. Muzik, and H. J. Crazado. 1954. Studies on nutsedge
(Cyperus rotundus
L.) and its control.
Menn, W. G. and J. B.
Beard. 1989.
Effect of imazaquin on control of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) in a common bermudagrass
(Cynodon dactylon)
turf.
SAS Institute, 1982. SAS Users Guide,
Sturkie, D. C. 1967. Controlling
nutgrass (nutsedge) in
lawns.
Thullen, R. J. and P. E. Keeley. 1979. Seed germination in Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus. Weed Sci. 27:502-505.
Wills, G.
D. 1987. Description of purple and yellow nutsedge
(Cyperus rotundus
and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:2-9.